The Collaboration Clique


At this year’s #CIPD14 conference I highlighted that I heard the word collaboration being dropped throughout a range of different sessions. The word isn’t new – it comes from the Latin collaboratio meaning “work together” – yet the use of the term has increased sharply, particularly since the early 1980’s.

While their meanings are almost identical, collaboration has a much more cosy feel than it’s usurped forbear teamwork. The latter hints at retention of individual roles. Tasks are divided up into manageable chunks, handed out and later fitted back together like a jigsaw puzzle. Not ideal when there’s no guarantee a coherent picture will be formed.

Conversely, collaboration is portrayed more of a collective consciousness. It is producing a great painting whereby each artist adds their own unique brushstroke. The idea appeals to the human psyche as a much more beautiful and fluid way of achieving. Yet, our brains actually struggle to work in that way.

Collaboration in theory means a potent mix of raw talent. Individual skills seamlessly blending to provide a much more powerful outcome. It’s both balancing different strengths and forming a unified whole. However, the former means that the latter is difficult to acheve, and vice versa. Human personality has a tendency to continually push people towards homogonisation, to the exclusion of the unusual. Hence the collaboration clique.

Taking a bunch of talented people and leaving them to it is an imaginary ideal more likely to lead to a Lord of the Flies style disaster. Facilitation should go hand in hand with collaboration, and not just at the start, throughout the project. As always, the newest, most popular “tool” isn’t a quick fix that can be grafted on to a gaping wound.

I believe collaboration is such an important concept, and with the growth in tech and social media this is only likely to increase, But unfortunately it’s not as easy as it may seem, or as we would like it to be.

2 thoughts on “The Collaboration Clique

  1. It’s interesting that this is exactly what spurred Meredith Belbin to develop his famous “team types”: the situation where a group of extremely talented individuals failed spectacularly to achieve their task (the US “Bay Of Pigs”invasion which was a complete disaster)

    I also find it interesting that 60-70 years ago, during WW2, being a “collaborator” was one of the worst things you could be!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s